helicopter view.

27 Oct, 2017

Clariant and Huntsman call off $20bn merger deal today

Clariant and Huntsman call off $20bn merger deal today

Chemicals groups admit defeat in face of opposition from US activist investors. It would have created the world’s 2nd biggest specialty chemicals company

Swiss specialty chemicals maker Clariant and Texas-based Huntsman Corp. today abandoned their $20 billion merger, giving in to activist investors who had fought against the deal for months on the grounds that it would destroy shareholder value.

The deal would have created the world’s second-biggest specialty chemicals company, behind Germany’s Evonik. The two companies had first announced their plans to merge in May, in a deal that would have given Clariant 52 percent of the combined company.

White Tale, the investment vehicle of hedge fund manager Keith Meister and New York City-based fund 40 North, had increased its Clariant stake to more than 20 percent. White Tale, coupled with other Clariant shareholders who came out against the deal, left the Swiss company doubtful of mustering the two-thirds support necessary for the merger to go through.

Meister and 40 North’s David Winter and David Millstone argued the merger wouldn’t deliver enough benefits (the companies had promised $400 million a year in extra operating efficiency), while exposing Clariant to the U. S. company’s debt and its volatile commodity chemicals business.

«It both significantly destroys existing Clariant shareholder value and prevents Clariant from pursuing multiple alternative and immediate opportunities to unlock value for its shareholders," White Tale said last month.

Chief Executive Hariolf Kottmann said Clariant still had options to explore after further talks with White Tale.

»To do a merger of equals … is one option, to make a large transformational transaction is another option, to continue to stand alone is a third option," Kottmann told reporters on a call where he vowed to remain CEO.

Huntsman CEO Peter Huntsman said he was disappointed the transaction did not go through. His company has incurred around $18 million in merger-related costs. The two companies have, however, agreed to forego breakup fees.

By Fortune Editors and Reuters

Read also: World Foreign Direct Investment Trends UNCTAD 2017 (Part 1, Part 2), TOP five 2017 year FDI Confidence Index changes

Read about M&A: Mandate F. A. Q., DD Check List

Our suggestions: 20 Must-Read Books

More about raising capital: Mezzanine financing, Equity financing, Debt financing, Investopedia: What is Private Equity?, What is The Difference Between Private Equity and Venture Capital?

Company Valuation Methods: Part1, Part2, Part3, Part4, Part5, Part6, Part7, Part8

Some strategies of raising capital: Bringing Your Company Public, Exploring Alternative Capital-Raising Strategies, Refinancing and Minority Equity as Partial Exit Strategies, 5 Alternatives To IPOs, How to Raise Capital For a Company in Financial Troubles, 7 Private Equity Strategies, Why Successful Business Owners Sell Out, The Six Types of Successful Acquisitions, Race to Become a Global Player, Refinancing and Minority Equity as Partial Exit Strategies, Guide To Equity Release Or «Cash-Out»

blog picture

24 Nov, 2021

Spain extends foreign takeover curbs to help aid recovery

Spain on Tuesday approved a year-long extension, until the end of 2022, to restrictions on foreign takeovers of Spanish companies it regards as strategic....

read more
blog picture

08 Nov, 2021

China: What is Evergrande and is it too big to fail?

Global financial markets have been on high alert as cash-strapped Chinese property giant Evergrande faces several key tests in the coming days....

read more